{"id":26157,"date":"2025-06-16T11:10:33","date_gmt":"2025-06-16T10:10:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/?post_type=legal-trends&#038;p=26157"},"modified":"2025-06-16T11:10:35","modified_gmt":"2025-06-16T10:10:35","slug":"us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill","status":"publish","type":"legal-trends","link":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cThe \u2018Big Beautiful Bill\u2019: Unpacking US Tax Policy Shifts and Their International Implications"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In the latest episode of the Chambers Expert Focus Weil Tax Insight series, Devon Bodoh and Greg Featherman, partners in Weil, Gotshal and Manges\u2019 tax department, discuss the Trump administration Big Beautiful (and controversial) Bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>The \u201cBig Beautiful Bill\u201d, officially known as HR One, passed the House on 22 May 2025, and is now under Senate consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe style=\"border-radius:12px\" src=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/embed\/episode\/7CwBwEGn7DBwQMZLLM3Jrc?utm_source=generator&amp;theme=0\" width=\"100%\" height=\"152\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"\" allow=\"autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/iframe>\n\n\n\n<p>Particularly notable among its many provisions, is the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) regime, which would become a permanent 49.2% deduction, resulting in an effective rate of 10.688%. This prevents the scheduled decrease to 37.5% after 31 December 2025, which would have led to a 13.125% rate, thus providing a significant benefit to US multinationals. Interestingly, the legislation does not extend the controlled foreign corporation look-through rule of 954(C)(6), allowing it to expire.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>The foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) deduction would be set permanently at 36.5%, leading to a 13.335% rate, applicable when intellectual property is used in US manufacturing for export. The base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) rate would be 10.1%, notably excluding the research credit and a portion of Section 38 credits from reducing regular tax liability, which raises the threshold for BEAT applicability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>Several provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 are reinstated for 2025\u201329, including deductibility of US research and development costs (or an elective 60-month capitalisation under Section 174) and a 100% additional first-year depreciation deduction under Section 168(K) for property acquired and placed in service within this period. The Section 163(J) limit on interest deductibility would revert to being based on EBITDA for tax years beginning after 31 December 2024, but before 1 January 2030, offering an additional benefit compared to the current EBIT-based limit. Section 199A, which allows certain individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct 20% of business income, would be made permanent and the deduction increased to 23%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>In terms of state and local taxes, the individual deduction cap would increase from USD10,000 to USD40,000. The bill would also eliminate the pass-through entity tax workaround, which allowed partnerships and S corporations to bypass the USD10,000 cap by having the entity pay the tax. Other notable changes include increasing the gift tax exemption from USD5 million to USD15 million, increasing the standard deduction through 2028, 100% bonus depreciation for new manufacturing facilities, and a new tip deduction for individuals. Material modifications, including early sunsets and phase-outs, are also made to the energy provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>Section 899, termed the \u201cenforcement of remedies against unfair taxes\u201d, is closely aligned with the \u201cAmerica First\u201d policy. This Section applies to foreign governments, corporations and their affiliates (excluding controlled foreign corporations) that impose what is deemed to be an \u201cunfair tax\u201d on US persons or US-owned foreign entities. Unfair taxes are defined to include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>under-taxed profits rules, common in thirty countries;<\/li><li>digital services taxes, implemented by seven countries;<\/li><li>diverted profits taxes, present in two countries; and<\/li><li>a catch-all for any other extraterritorial or discriminatory tax explicitly designed for the United States to bear the cost.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Exceptions to such supposed \u201cunfair taxes\u201d include basic corporate income tax, taxes on permanent establishments and withholding taxes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>The consequence of a country imposing an unfair tax is an annual increase of five percentage points in the US tax rate on relevant foreign taxpayers for a four-year period, resulting in a maximum increase of twenty percentage points. For instance, a 30% statutory withholding tax could rise to 50%. For countries with treaties, the baseline rate for the increase starts from the treaty rate. Section 892, which provides beneficial tax treatment to foreign governments and sovereign wealth funds, is effectively turned off under this rule, making it punitive even if they have treaty availability (eg, a 0% treaty rate could become 20%). An important exception is portfolio interest, which retains its 0% withholding rate regardless of Section 899. Furthermore, Section 899 expands the BEAT provisions, making it more likely to apply to foreign companies with US investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"publication":[],"locations":[],"blocks":[{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>In the latest episode of the Chambers Expert Focus Weil Tax Insight series, Devon Bodoh and Greg Featherman, partners in Weil, Gotshal and Manges\u2019 tax department, discuss the Trump administration Big Beautiful (and controversial) Bill.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>In the latest episode of the Chambers Expert Focus Weil Tax Insight series, Devon Bodoh and Greg Featherman, partners in Weil, Gotshal and Manges\u2019 tax department, discuss the Trump administration Big Beautiful (and controversial) Bill.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-media-list","attrs":{"media-list":"%5B%7B%22title%22:%22Devon%20Bodoh%22,%22buttonName%22:%22View%20profile%22,%22content%22:%22Ranked%20in%20Chambers%20USA:%20Tax%22,%22buttonUrl%22:%22https:\/\/chambers.com\/lawyer\/devon-bodoh-usa-5:1181981%22,%22image%22:%7B%22alt%22:%22Devon%20Bodoh,%20Weil,%20EF%20contributor%22,%22title%22:%22Devon%20Bodoh,%20Weil%22,%22caption%22:%22%22,%22description%22:%22%22,%22id%22:15388,%22link%22:%22https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/spin-off-taxation-in-the-usa\/devon-bodoh-circle\/%22,%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120422\/Devon-Bodoh-circle.jpg%22,%22sizes%22:%7B%22thumbnail%22:%7B%22height%22:120,%22width%22:120,%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120422\/Devon-Bodoh-circle-120x120.jpg%22,%22orientation%22:%22landscape%22%7D,%22medium%22:%7B%22height%22:300,%22width%22:300,%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120422\/Devon-Bodoh-circle-300x300.jpg%22,%22orientation%22:%22landscape%22%7D,%22large%22:%7B%22height%22:1024,%22width%22:1024,%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120422\/Devon-Bodoh-circle-1024x1024.jpg%22,%22orientation%22:%22landscape%22%7D,%22full%22:%7B%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120422\/Devon-Bodoh-circle.jpg%22,%22height%22:1696,%22width%22:1696,%22orientation%22:%22landscape%22%7D%7D%7D%7D,%7B%22title%22:%22Greg%20Featherman%22,%22buttonName%22:%22View%20firm%20profile%22,%22buttonUrl%22:%22https:\/\/chambers.com\/law-firm\/weil-gotshal-manges-llp-global-2:3667%22,%22image%22:%7B%22alt%22:%22%22,%22title%22:%22Greg-Featherman-circ%22,%22caption%22:%22%22,%22description%22:%7B%22raw%22:%22%22,%22rendered%22:%22%3Cp%20class=%5C%22attachment%5C%22%3E%3Ca%20href='https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Greg-Featherman-circ.jpg'%3E%3Cimg%20width=%5C%22300%5C%22%20height=%5C%22300%5C%22%20src=%5C%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/03120215\/Greg-Featherman-circ-300x300.jpg%5C%22%20class=%5C%22attachment-medium%20size-medium%5C%22%20alt=%5C%22%5C%22%20srcset=%5C%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/03120215\/Greg-Featherman-circ-300x300.jpg%20300w,%20https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/03120215\/Greg-Featherman-circ-120x120.jpg%20120w,%20https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Greg-Featherman-circ.jpg%20366w%5C%22%20sizes=%5C%22(max-width:%20300px)%20100vw,%20300px%5C%22%20\/%3E%3C\/a%3E%3C\/p%3E%5Cn%22%7D,%22id%22:18204,%22link%22:%22https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/?attachment_id=18204%22,%22url%22:%22https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Greg-Featherman-circ.jpg%22,%22sizes%22:%22%22%7D%7D%5D","blockId":"ToK9S","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-media-list-ToK9S"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-header","attrs":{"header":"Key Provisions: GILTI, FIDI and the Return of Several TCJA Benefits","headerLevel":"2","blockId":"ZQe1B2","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-header-ZQe1B2"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>The \u201cBig Beautiful Bill\u201d, officially known as HR One, passed the House on 22 May 2025, and is now under Senate consideration.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>The \u201cBig Beautiful Bill\u201d, officially known as HR One, passed the House on 22 May 2025, and is now under Senate consideration.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/html","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<iframe style=\"border-radius:12px\" src=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/embed\/episode\/7CwBwEGn7DBwQMZLLM3Jrc?utm_source=generator&amp;theme=0\" width=\"100%\" height=\"152\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"\" allow=\"autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/iframe>\n","innerContent":["\n<iframe style=\"border-radius:12px\" src=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/embed\/episode\/7CwBwEGn7DBwQMZLLM3Jrc?utm_source=generator&amp;theme=0\" width=\"100%\" height=\"152\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"\" allow=\"autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/iframe>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>Particularly notable among its many provisions, is the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) regime, which would become a permanent 49.2% deduction, resulting in an effective rate of 10.688%. This prevents the scheduled decrease to 37.5% after 31 December 2025, which would have led to a 13.125% rate, thus providing a significant benefit to US multinationals. Interestingly, the legislation does not extend the controlled foreign corporation look-through rule of 954(C)(6), allowing it to expire.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>Particularly notable among its many provisions, is the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) regime, which would become a permanent 49.2% deduction, resulting in an effective rate of 10.688%. This prevents the scheduled decrease to 37.5% after 31 December 2025, which would have led to a 13.125% rate, thus providing a significant benefit to US multinationals. Interestingly, the legislation does not extend the controlled foreign corporation look-through rule of 954(C)(6), allowing it to expire.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-quote","attrs":{"quote":"<p>\u201cThis is America saying we don\u2019t like your tax regime, we think it\u2019s discriminatory.\u201d<\/p>","blockId":"1mz3zV","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-quote-1mz3zV"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>The foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) deduction would be set permanently at 36.5%, leading to a 13.335% rate, applicable when intellectual property is used in US manufacturing for export. The base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) rate would be 10.1%, notably excluding the research credit and a portion of Section 38 credits from reducing regular tax liability, which raises the threshold for BEAT applicability.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>The foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) deduction would be set permanently at 36.5%, leading to a 13.335% rate, applicable when intellectual property is used in US manufacturing for export. The base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) rate would be 10.1%, notably excluding the research credit and a portion of Section 38 credits from reducing regular tax liability, which raises the threshold for BEAT applicability.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-quote","attrs":{"quote":"<p>\u201cThere\u2019s a real battle on that along political lines. The higher tax states tended to be the democratic states, and this was therefore a political issue.\u201d<\/p>","blockId":"Z2nnaQj","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-quote-Z2nnaQj"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>Several provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 are reinstated for 2025\u201329, including deductibility of US research and development costs (or an elective 60-month capitalisation under Section 174) and a 100% additional first-year depreciation deduction under Section 168(K) for property acquired and placed in service within this period. The Section 163(J) limit on interest deductibility would revert to being based on EBITDA for tax years beginning after 31 December 2024, but before 1 January 2030, offering an additional benefit compared to the current EBIT-based limit. Section 199A, which allows certain individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct 20% of business income, would be made permanent and the deduction increased to 23%.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>Several provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 are reinstated for 2025\u201329, including deductibility of US research and development costs (or an elective 60-month capitalisation under Section 174) and a 100% additional first-year depreciation deduction under Section 168(K) for property acquired and placed in service within this period. The Section 163(J) limit on interest deductibility would revert to being based on EBITDA for tax years beginning after 31 December 2024, but before 1 January 2030, offering an additional benefit compared to the current EBIT-based limit. Section 199A, which allows certain individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct 20% of business income, would be made permanent and the deduction increased to 23%.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-header","attrs":{"header":"State and Local Taxes","headerLevel":"2","blockId":"1G01dn","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-header-1G01dn"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>In terms of state and local taxes, the individual deduction cap would increase from USD10,000 to USD40,000. The bill would also eliminate the pass-through entity tax workaround, which allowed partnerships and S corporations to bypass the USD10,000 cap by having the entity pay the tax. Other notable changes include increasing the gift tax exemption from USD5 million to USD15 million, increasing the standard deduction through 2028, 100% bonus depreciation for new manufacturing facilities, and a new tip deduction for individuals. Material modifications, including early sunsets and phase-outs, are also made to the energy provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>In terms of state and local taxes, the individual deduction cap would increase from USD10,000 to USD40,000. The bill would also eliminate the pass-through entity tax workaround, which allowed partnerships and S corporations to bypass the USD10,000 cap by having the entity pay the tax. Other notable changes include increasing the gift tax exemption from USD5 million to USD15 million, increasing the standard deduction through 2028, 100% bonus depreciation for new manufacturing facilities, and a new tip deduction for individuals. Material modifications, including early sunsets and phase-outs, are also made to the energy provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-header","attrs":{"header":"Section 899","headerLevel":"2","blockId":"Z2rWqJ2","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-header-Z2rWqJ2"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>Section 899, termed the \u201cenforcement of remedies against unfair taxes\u201d, is closely aligned with the \u201cAmerica First\u201d policy. This Section applies to foreign governments, corporations and their affiliates (excluding controlled foreign corporations) that impose what is deemed to be an \u201cunfair tax\u201d on US persons or US-owned foreign entities. Unfair taxes are defined to include:<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>Section 899, termed the \u201cenforcement of remedies against unfair taxes\u201d, is closely aligned with the \u201cAmerica First\u201d policy. This Section applies to foreign governments, corporations and their affiliates (excluding controlled foreign corporations) that impose what is deemed to be an \u201cunfair tax\u201d on US persons or US-owned foreign entities. Unfair taxes are defined to include:<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/list","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<ul><li>under-taxed profits rules, common in thirty countries;<\/li><li>digital services taxes, implemented by seven countries;<\/li><li>diverted profits taxes, present in two countries; and<\/li><li>a catch-all for any other extraterritorial or discriminatory tax explicitly designed for the United States to bear the cost.<\/li><\/ul>\n","innerContent":["\n<ul><li>under-taxed profits rules, common in thirty countries;<\/li><li>digital services taxes, implemented by seven countries;<\/li><li>diverted profits taxes, present in two countries; and<\/li><li>a catch-all for any other extraterritorial or discriminatory tax explicitly designed for the United States to bear the cost.<\/li><\/ul>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>Exceptions to such supposed \u201cunfair taxes\u201d include basic corporate income tax, taxes on permanent establishments and withholding taxes.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>Exceptions to such supposed \u201cunfair taxes\u201d include basic corporate income tax, taxes on permanent establishments and withholding taxes.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-quote","attrs":{"quote":"<p>\u201cSection 899 really is designed as a way to get foreign countries to negotiate with the US, to drop what they view as these unfair tax regimes.\u201d<\/p>","blockId":"ZBDSrr","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-quote-ZBDSrr"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"core\/paragraph","attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n<p>The consequence of a country imposing an unfair tax is an annual increase of five percentage points in the US tax rate on relevant foreign taxpayers for a four-year period, resulting in a maximum increase of twenty percentage points. For instance, a 30% statutory withholding tax could rise to 50%. For countries with treaties, the baseline rate for the increase starts from the treaty rate. Section 892, which provides beneficial tax treatment to foreign governments and sovereign wealth funds, is effectively turned off under this rule, making it punitive even if they have treaty availability (eg, a 0% treaty rate could become 20%). An important exception is portfolio interest, which retains its 0% withholding rate regardless of Section 899. Furthermore, Section 899 expands the BEAT provisions, making it more likely to apply to foreign companies with US investments.<\/p>\n","innerContent":["\n<p>The consequence of a country imposing an unfair tax is an annual increase of five percentage points in the US tax rate on relevant foreign taxpayers for a four-year period, resulting in a maximum increase of twenty percentage points. For instance, a 30% statutory withholding tax could rise to 50%. For countries with treaties, the baseline rate for the increase starts from the treaty rate. Section 892, which provides beneficial tax treatment to foreign governments and sovereign wealth funds, is effectively turned off under this rule, making it punitive even if they have treaty availability (eg, a 0% treaty rate could become 20%). An important exception is portfolio interest, which retains its 0% withholding rate regardless of Section 899. Furthermore, Section 899 expands the BEAT provisions, making it more likely to apply to foreign companies with US investments.<\/p>\n"]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-header","attrs":{"header":"Weil, Gotshal & Manges","headerLevel":"3","blockId":"2st3bI","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-header-2st3bI"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/chambers-media-list","attrs":{"media-list":"%5B%7B%22image%22:%7B%22alt%22:%22Weil,%20Gotshal%20&%20Manges%20LLP,%20EF%20contributing%20firm%22,%22title%22:%22Weil%202C%22,%22caption%22:%22%22,%22description%22:%22%22,%22id%22:15389,%22link%22:%22https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/spin-off-taxation-in-the-usa\/weil-2c-2\/%22,%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120954\/Weil-Logo-210x144-1.jpg%22,%22sizes%22:%7B%22thumbnail%22:%7B%22height%22:120,%22width%22:120,%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120954\/Weil-Logo-210x144-1-120x120.jpg%22,%22orientation%22:%22landscape%22%7D,%22full%22:%7B%22url%22:%22https:\/\/assets.chambers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/14120954\/Weil-Logo-210x144-1.jpg%22,%22height%22:144,%22width%22:210,%22orientation%22:%22landscape%22%7D%7D%7D,%22title%22:%2261%20ranked%20departments%20and%2093%20ranked%20lawyers%22,%22content%22:%22Learn%20more%20about%20the%20firm%E2%80%99s%20ranking%20in%20Chambers%20USA%22,%22buttonName%22:%22View%20firm%20profile%22,%22buttonUrl%22:%22https:\/\/chambers.com\/law-firm\/weil-gotshal-manges-llp-usa-5:3667%22%7D%5D","blockId":"Z2shI54","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-chambers-media-list-Z2shI54"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]},{"blockName":null,"attrs":[],"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"\n\n","innerContent":["\n\n"]},{"blockName":"lazyblock\/promo-block","attrs":{"title":"Chambers In Focus Newsletter","content":"Sign up for our newsletter and never miss out on thought leadership content from legal experts and the key stories driving the legal profession forward.","button-title":"Sign up here","button-url":"https:\/\/crm.chambers.com\/l\/854103\/2023-07-05\/h7hd2 ","blockId":"Z2emDOb","blockUniqueClass":"lazyblock-promo-block-Z2emDOb"},"innerBlocks":[],"innerHTML":"","innerContent":[]}],"new_scheduled_revision":null,"save_as_revision":null,"acf":{"sponsored_page":false,"media_type":"podcast","index_page":"","firm_page_url":"https:\/\/chambers.com\/law-firm\/weil-gotshal-manges-llp-usa-5:3667","social_sharing_post_options":{"alignment":"left","sticky":false},"title":"","sponsors_list":{"sponsors":false,"showhide_borders":false},"hero_title":"","hero_description":"","hero_content_color":"light","hero_enable_responsive_images":false,"hero_image":false,"hero_retina_image":false,"useful_links":false,"template":{"name":"text-rich-media","sticky_sidebar":false}},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v15.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explore the key provisions of the US \u201cBig Beautiful Bill,\u201d including changes to GILTI, FDII, and BEAT, and their global implications for multinationals.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"US Tax Policy Shifts: The Big Beautiful Bill | Chambers Expert Focus\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explore the key provisions of the US \u201cBig Beautiful Bill,\u201d including changes to GILTI, FDII, and BEAT, and their global implications for multinationals.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Chambers and Partners | Researching Outstanding Lawyers Globally | chambers.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-16T10:10:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/\",\"name\":\"Chambers and Partners | Researching Outstanding Lawyers Globally | chambers.com\",\"description\":\"Chambers and Partners identifies and ranks the most outstanding law firms and lawyers in over 180 jurisdictions throughout the world.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/\",\"name\":\"US Tax Policy Shifts: The Big Beautiful Bill | Chambers Expert Focus\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-16T10:10:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-16T10:10:35+00:00\",\"description\":\"Explore the key provisions of the US \\u201cBig Beautiful Bill,\\u201d including changes to GILTI, FDII, and BEAT, and their global implications for multinationals.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/\"]}]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_title":null,"yoast_meta":[{"name":"description","content":"Explore the key provisions of the US \u201cBig Beautiful Bill,\u201d including changes to GILTI, FDII, and BEAT, and their global implications for multinationals."},{"name":"robots","content":"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1"},{"property":"og:locale","content":"en_GB"},{"property":"og:type","content":"article"},{"property":"og:title","content":"US Tax Policy Shifts: The Big Beautiful Bill | Chambers Expert Focus"},{"property":"og:description","content":"Explore the key provisions of the US \u201cBig Beautiful Bill,\u201d including changes to GILTI, FDII, and BEAT, and their global implications for multinationals."},{"property":"og:url","content":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/"},{"property":"og:site_name","content":"Chambers and Partners | Researching Outstanding Lawyers Globally | chambers.com"},{"property":"article:modified_time","content":"2025-06-16T10:10:35+00:00"},{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],"yoast_json_ld":[{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/","name":"Chambers and Partners | Researching Outstanding Lawyers Globally | chambers.com","description":"Chambers and Partners identifies and ranks the most outstanding law firms and lawyers in over 180 jurisdictions throughout the world.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/?s={search_term_string}","query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/","name":"US Tax Policy Shifts: The Big Beautiful Bill | Chambers Expert Focus","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-16T10:10:33+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-16T10:10:35+00:00","description":"Explore the key provisions of the US \u201cBig Beautiful Bill,\u201d including changes to GILTI, FDII, and BEAT, and their global implications for multinationals.","inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/legal-trends\/us-tax-policy-big-beautiful-bill\/"]}]}]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal-trends\/26157"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal-trends"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/legal-trends"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publications","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication?post=26157"},{"taxonomy":"locations","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpcms.chambers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/locations?post=26157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}